Question:
What is 0bama hiding?
?
2010-05-13 15:43:25 UTC
Why can't 0bama prove he was born in the United States? Or could it be something else on his birth certificate that he does not want anyone to see that has nothing to do with where he was born? The real question you might say is, why was it so important for 0bama to sign 'Executive Order 13489' on his first day in office baring the release of his birth certificate, signed on 21 January 2009?
Fifteen answers:
2010-05-13 16:00:24 UTC
I used to think it was just that Liberals are immature.



But then I noticed a disturbing pattern, over and over and over: most Liberals can't even engage in civil discourse, and when they are confronted with positions that don't match theirs, they lash out like crazed pitbulls.



I have been carefully going over this oddity for a long time now, and like others before me have concluded that Liberalism really is a mental disorder.



"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness."



"Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."



While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing conspiracy."



For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.



Ronald Reagan once quipped, "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”



I think Reagan hit upon something very prescient! Liberals seem to have a very, very tenuous grasp of things. Therefore, they figuratively dig their claws in and fight tooth and nail against anything that doesn't fit their viewpoint of the world. The Liberal mind is about as stable as a house of cards. On some level, they realize that confronting reality will destroy their entire view of the world, much like someone in the 1200's finally realizing the shocking truth that the world isn't flat. Imagine how difficult it was for scared sailors to finally accept the truth: they lived meager lives unnecessarily. The horizon wasn't full of sea serpents. There was no edge of the world.



Conservatives absolutely baffle and exasperate Liberals. Why? Because Conservatives appear to have solid beliefs while the Liberal is lucky if he can formulate some vague, hazy philosphy of things. When the Conservative argues with the Liberal, the Liberal feels he must lash out for fear of discovering that his whole imaginary world is just that: fiction.



So, Liberals preach "tolerant", but only tolerance for THEIR viewpoints. Anything else is heresy. Just try confronting a Liberal with the facts about global warming and he'll practically start foaming at the mouth. The mind of the Liberal cannot acknowledge that a Conservative is right because the fuzzy Liberal mind is like a shaky house of cards. If the Liberal realizes he's wrong about one thing, it totally destroys their whole imagined reality he has constructed for himself.



So when Liberals scream like threatened children when you talk about FOX News, or Rush Limbaugh, it is because their brains are not wired to accept contradictory information. I read extensively; both from the Left and the Right. I put my beliefs to the test by really checking if they are based on fact, evidence, and not just conjecture and a psychological construct.



Liberals cannot do this. It would destroy their carefully-crafted dream world existence.
bucks fan
2010-05-13 15:53:50 UTC
If you actually read Executive Order 13489, or at least researched it, you would know 2 things:



1. It never mentions birth certificates or anything related to birth certificates. If it does, post the part that mentions this.



2. It is almost identical to executive orders that were passed very early in other president's terms, including Bush and Reagan. It is just something that every president does.
bdozen13
2010-05-14 12:32:49 UTC
He has time and time again. He even went so far as to have the FBI investigate and verify his birth. Records show he has a legal birth certificate and new papers in the area he was born showed his birth. Those who are still pushing this issue are slow to learn or just plain ignorant!
itsamini1
2010-05-14 08:05:28 UTC
I don't understand why he does not put a stop to this and present his birth certificate to the Supreme Court, but no he held a closed meeting with them and the case was dismissed.



A post of a birth certificate on a website does not cut it, that is way too easy to fake.
Chewy Ivan 2
2010-05-13 15:49:54 UTC
What are you hiding?



Obama already released his birth certificate. Even if you found incontrovertable evidence that Obama was actually born in a Kenyan hospital while his mother was visiting his father's family, it still doesn't prove Obama isn't a "natural born citizen." The fact his mother was a citizen means he is concerned a citizen since birth, i.e. "natural born citizen." If you are claiming their is some kind of conspiracy to put a non-citizen in the White House, Chief Justice Roberts would have to be in on it, too, and I find that a little too hard to believe.
prekinpdx
2010-05-13 15:49:24 UTC
This executive order is virtually the same as Executive Order 123283, which President George W. Bush issued early in his presidency and which it replaced. That executive order is in turn virtually identical to its predecessor Executive Order 12667 which was issued by President Reagan. All of these orders deal specifically with the National Archive and its role in preserving presidential papers and records. The orders refer only to records generated by the office of the President during his administration which have been kept by the National Archive since that institution was created in 1934. Does that answer your 'real' question?



Holy hell - he has proven it. Give it a rest. The better question would be why don't you believe the evidence and continue to wear a lonney hat. Was 9/11 an inside job as well?
?
2010-05-14 12:40:46 UTC
A few of the letters of his name were messed up and needs to be redone, it read Ralf Obama or something like that, the photo copier was not working well that morning
?
2010-05-13 15:50:54 UTC
I'm no fan of Obama, but who really cares? I for one, votes for the person and what they stand for, not where they come from. That is why, while not an American, if I could have voted in the last US election, I would have held my nose and voted for the man born in Panama.
justa
2010-05-13 15:49:50 UTC
No, not that again, are infant problems to blame for thousands wanting, pleading for Obama, the most investigated president ever, to be an immigrant.
FootballFan1012
2010-05-13 15:46:56 UTC
I don't see any mention of hiding a birth certificate. Nice try.
justpolitics
2010-05-13 15:51:01 UTC
Have you read Executive Order 13233?



@zzsleepur Your copied/pasted story is 100% made up. http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama_citizenship_questioned.htm
2010-05-13 15:45:19 UTC
Sometimes if you put things in plain view, men can't see them.
2010-05-13 15:44:31 UTC
VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT



AP - WASHINGTON D.C. -

In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications

for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has

Released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental

College . Released today, the transcript school indicates that Obama, under

the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from

Indonesia as an undergraduate. The transcript was released by Occidental

College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in

the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro)

applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students

from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the

scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.

This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of

Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was

first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for

UScitizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a

firestorm

at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's

legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled, "Obama

Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may

overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a

related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice

Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear

arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a

case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's

dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case

is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's

citizenship or qualification to serve as president.



Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the

results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study

estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the

past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block

disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the

investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to

the U..S. attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment

on the matter...



LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS, THE MEDIA WON'T !



* Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?*



While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama

birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the

issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport

did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?



So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981,

without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the

price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?



And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta ,

and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs

and Immigration?



The American people not only deserve to have answers to these

questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's

citizenship a rather short and simple one.



Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?

A : Yes, by his own admission.



Q: What passport did he travel under?

A: There are only three possibilities.

1) He traveled with a U.S. .. Passport,

2) He traveled with a British passport, or

3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.



Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. .. State

Department's "no travel" list in 1981.



Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling

either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.



If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide

proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he

claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend

to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held,

British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in

1967.



Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know

how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and

2008..



Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as

illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan

he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all t
Flowmaster
2010-05-13 15:47:06 UTC
Can you say skulk?
2010-05-13 15:44:55 UTC
His utter contempt for whites...


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...